|
|
|
Chirokinetics in Anaphylaxia“In organising this pilot trial into the effects of Chirokinetics in anaphylaxia, it was my hope the results would demonstrate that other people at risk from anaphylactic shock might benefit from this treatment, as my wife and I have. I am very pleased with the enclosed results which clearly show CKT to be both safe and effective, warranting further clinical investigation.” -Mike Collyer (trial organiser) Chirokinetic Therapy (CKT) was developed by David Stevens, a qualified chiropractor, in 1997. Based on naturopathic principles CKT is a melding of chiropractic and a basic form of muscle testing. CKT works by identifying and correcting imbalances which have altered the body’s immune response. THE AIM OF THE TRIAL IS TO ESTABLISH THE POSSIBILITY OF DECREASING AN INDIVIDUAL’S REACTIVITY TO THEIR ALLERGEN TO BELOW THE ANAPHYLACTIC THRESHOLD. Trial participants have a previous history of suffering anaphylactic attacks to various substances. All carry an EpiPen and most have been hospitalised on at least one occasion. For the purposes of this investigation their history was considered the most reliable indication of their allergy status. Additionally, several had previous serology examinations. Following a course of CKT treatments participants were required to have a specific Immunoglobulin E examination to determine their allergy status to their known allergen. Conclusion. The results would seem to indicate a significant decrease in reactivity to the specific allergen. Of the ten original participants one was unable to complete the trial and one is awaiting a blood test. Eight have received blood tests the results of which, in all cases, show an SIgE between 0 – 3. Reference range 0 – 6, 0 = negative, 1= borderline, 6= strongly positive. Furthermore five individuals have been accidentally exposed to the specific allergen which previously caused a reaction, without displaying the usual symptoms associated with anaphylaxia. ALL BLOOD TEST RESULTS OBTAINED FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCESMike age 48Mike was anaphylactic to honey bee venom, his first attack occurred whilst he was carrying out a motorcycle driving test in his capacity as an examiner. Mike was given three treatments between 14th January 2004 and 24th January 2004. CKT testing indicated that Mike was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Results date: 4th February 2004Total IgE 6 normal range (0.2 – 180) Honey bee 0 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Mike has subsequently been stung by a honey bee whilst gardening on Good Friday 2004 and no symptoms associated with anaphylaxia were experienced. Here are copies of the independent reports
Simon age 25Simon was allergic to all types of nuts. His first anaphylactic attack was in November 2002 due to brazil nuts. He was diagnosed as anaphylactic in January 2003. Simon’s symptoms included; throat closure, swelling tongue, falling blood pressure, severe rash and difficulty in breathing. Simon was given four treatments between 6th June 2004 and 29th June 2004. CKT testing indicated that Simon was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Results prior to treatment: 27th December 2002SIgEReference range 0 - 6 Brazil nut 6 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Results 12th July 2004Total IgE 311.8 normal range (0.2 – 180) Nut mix 4 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Results 12th May 2005Total IgE 255.6 normal range (0.2 – 180) Nut mix 0 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Simon accidentally ingested some brazil nut one evening and experienced tingling in the mouth. He did not however display any other of the symptoms associated with anaphylaxia, there was no drop in blood pressure and no difficulty in breathing. Due to the still considerable SIgE of 4 and Simon’s total IgE of 311.8 he was given a further five CKT treatments between 15th July 2004 and 12th August 2004 and went for a further blood test at the on 12th May 2005. Simon is very pleased with the result and is now considering further treatment for his hay-fever. Here are copies of the independent reports
Results: 12th July 2004
Results: 12th May 2005
Karl age 21Karl experienced his first anaphylactic attack on the19th May 2001 due to peanuts. He immediately became ill and required emergency treatment, consisting of adrenaline, oxygen and was given an EpiPen. Karl received four treatments for his anaphylaxia to peanuts in June 2004. CKT testing indicated Karl to be below the anaphylactic threshold before having a blood test in July 2004 which revealed the following: Results: 5th July 2004Total IgE 36.95 normal range (0.2 – 180) Nut mix 3 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Although Karl’s total IgE was within normal range (36.93) the SIgE for peanut indicated further treatment was necessary and four more treatments were administered. On the 4th December 2004 Karl accidentally ate a peanut, an unexpected ingredient in a fruit cake. Karl says “I was very surprised even shocked when I realised I had eaten a peanut and although I felt OK I phoned David on his mobile. By this time over three hours had lapsed since eating the peanut, but David advised that I should contact my doctor straight away. “Thames Doc” deal with out of hours calls in my area and had provided emergency treatment for my previous anaphylactic attack. The doctor I spoke to quickly assessed my medical history and was very puzzled, I was told to stay by the phone and they would call back. By the time they returned my call, four hours had lapsed and I was symptom free, but still anxious. Because previously I had reacted very quickly, turning blue in less than twenty minutes, they decided that the treatment I had received must have had a positive effect and that I should take a dose of antihistamine and go to bed. I was further advised to contact the paramedics directly if I felt worse during the night. Fortunately I was fine both during the night and the following day”. Karl was given a follow up treatment on 9th December 2004, and in April 2005 he was again unlucky. This time it was peanut oil, which had provoked his first attack in May 2001. Karl experienced no ill effects whatsoever, in fact no symptoms of any kind were present. Here are copies of the independent reportsResults 05th July 2004
Debbie age 38Debbie was allergic to a variety of nuts and suffered her first anaphylactic attack in May 1995. A subsequent blood test on 20th June 1995 had classified peanut and coconut as borderline, walnut, hazelnut and almond as definite positives. Pecan which had previously triggered an anaphylactic attack was classified as high positive (see below).
Previous test provided: 20th June 1995Brazil nut, sweet chestnut - Negative Coconut, peanut - Borderline positive Walnut, Hazelnut, Almonds - Definite positives Pecan nut - High positive Debbie was given five CKT treatments between 20th January 2005 and 16th February 2005. CKT testing indicated that Debbie was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Results: 16th April 2005SIgEReference range 0 - 6 Sesame seed 0 Peanut 0 Soya bean 0 Hazelnut 2 Brazil nut 0 Almond 0 Pecan nut 2 Cashew nut 0 Pistachio 0 Walnut 2 Chestnut 0 Debbie is now being given a further course of CKT treatments in an attempt to reduce her reactivity still further. Here are copies of the independent reportsPrevious test provided: 20th June 1995
Results: 16th April 2005
Tim age 43In 2003 Tim was stung twice by wasps, he experienced intense itching, burning all over and his face swelled up to such an extent that he could not see. He also became extremely disorientated. He was rushed to hospital for emergency treatment. Tim was given a blood test the results of which were 3 for bee and 6 for wasp, set out as below. Tim was given four treatments between 06th June 2004 and 20th July 2004. CKT testing indicated that Tim was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Results: 7th July 2004Total IgE 62 normal range (0.2 – 180) SIgEReference range 0 - 6 Honey bee 0 Wasp 3 Mosquito 0 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive To the best of my knowledge Tim has not as yet, been stung by either bee or wasp. Here are copies of the independent reportsResults: 7th July 2004
Marcia age 46Marcia has a broad range of allergies and intolerances, including fruit, wheat, prescription drugs, paint and insect bites. Fish was her main allergy to which she was anaphylactic. Marcia was treated for her fish allergy in isolation to her other allergies. Four treatments were given between the 6th June 2004 and the 14th July 2004, following which, CKT testing indicated that Marcia was likely to be below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Results: 15th October 2004Total IgE 940 normal range (0.2 – 180) (IgE Panel VII) SIgEReference range 0 - 6 Fish mix 0 Tuna 0 Cod 0 Herring 0 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Obviously Marcia is still highly reactive to various foods and chemicals due to her total IgE reading of 940 but the SIgE results to fish, being 0, would seem to indicate that Marcia is no longer anaphylactic. Here are copies of the independent reportsResults: 15th October 2004
Amanda age 43Amanda has been an allergy sufferer since an early age, having been hospitalised several times due to her fish allergy. Contact with fish particularly salmon produced skin irritation, swelling and general discomfort including tingling of the mouth and throat. Obviously Amanda avoids eating fish at all costs, but due to her social obligations is regularly exposed to traces of fish through being greeted with handshakes and kisses. By the end of an event Amanda would have a red raw right hand and red wheals on her face where kissed.
Previous tests provided: 28th April 1995Total IgE 253.1 normal range (39.0 – 180) Cod 4 Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Amanda was given four treatments between the 30th April 2004 and 4th June 2004. CKT testing indicated that Amanda was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold and a blood test was organised. Test following CKT treatment. Results: 24th June 2004Total IgE 101 normal range (0.2 – 180) Salmon 2 Cod 2 Haddock 2Reference range 0= negative 1= borderline 6= strongly positive Since receiving CKT treatments Amanda has experienced none of the previous symptoms due to contact at banquets etc. but continues to avoid ingesting fish or fish products. Here are copies of the independent reportsPrevious tests provided: 28th April 1995
Results: 24th June 2004
Tina age 38Tina was anaphylactic to coffee, attacks were followed by severe exhaustion requiring several days bed rest. Tina received four treatments between 4th March 2004 and 15th October 2004. CKT testing indicated that Tina was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold. No blood test has been undertaken. Tina accidentally ingested coffee, in a dessert, whilst abroad on holiday. Anaphylactic symptoms were absent. Emily age 20Emily was allergic to peanuts since the age of five, when eating a “tracker bar” she started to vomit blood. Her first full blown anaphylactic attack happened when she was 19, which was a mild attack and she coped without medical intervention. Six months later she had a far heavier attack, where she could neither move nor breathe, and was hospitalised overnight. Emily was given three treatments between 6th June 2004 and 23rd June 2004. CKT testing indicated that Emily was in all probability now below the anaphylactic threshold. Blood test results are pending. |
|---|